Personal health record: taking back control of your medical records
A useful personal health record is more than a pile of PDFs. It should help you find the right information, check where it comes from and share it with the right professional. Here is a practical method for organizing your medical history while protecting your privacy and respecting your doctor’s role.
By Rubens Valcy
Founder of MyTwin
Published on
Contents
Prescriptions in an inbox, lab results spread across several portals, scans handed over on a CD, a report saved on a phone: the problem is not always missing information, but scattered information. When the time comes for an appointment, it gets hard to find the date of a test, the latest version of a prescription or the exact name of a treatment.
A personal health record aims to make that history easier to access. In France, for example, the national Mon espace santé (“My health space”) includes a medical record, secure messaging and other services approved by the public authorities, as the CNIL, France’s data protection authority, explains. A public service of this kind should not be confused with the many private apps that let you import or view documents: their purpose, status, recipients and safeguards may differ.
An impressive feature matters little if these basic tasks remain complicated.
Which documents should you gather?
There is no need to digitize your whole life in one go. Start with the documents that genuinely change how your situation is understood.
Start with the essentials
- current treatments, with their dosage and prescription date;
- documented allergies and intolerances;
- hospital discharge and surgery reports;
- recent lab and test results;
- imaging reports, along with the images when available;
- significant medical history and the contact details of the professionals who follow you.
A list typed in by the patient can be valuable, but it must be kept distinct from a document produced or validated by a professional. Keeping the author, date, facility and document type prevents a personal note from being mistaken for a medical report.
A timeline, not a storage unit
Your filing system should help answer one question: what has changed? Name files consistently, for example “2026-08-14_cardiology_report.pdf”, and avoid names like “scan-final-v2.pdf”. When the tool allows it, link each result to the event it belongs to: a consultation, a hospital stay, a change of treatment or a follow-up.
A timeline does not give information medical meaning on its own. Two lab values can only be compared if the methods, units and context allow it. Clinical interpretation must remain with the relevant professional.
Check quality before you share
Digital information can be outdated, incomplete or attributed to the wrong person. Before an important appointment, check the identity, date, author, facility, completeness and legibility of each document. If you spot an error, do not quietly correct it in the original document. Keep the original and ask the professional or facility concerned how to have it corrected.
In France, the Public Health Code governs patients’ access to their health information, and the CNIL points out that the sensitivity of health data justifies a specific legal framework. Neither principle means that every digital exchange is secure: sharing should go through an appropriate channel, to an identified recipient.
Share only what is needed
Sending your entire history to everyone you consult is neither always useful nor always wise. For a second opinion before surgery, the images, reports, relevant medical history and the clinical question may be enough. For an unrelated appointment, other documents have no reason to be shared.
Ask four questions before sharing anything:
- Who will receive the data?
- For what specific purpose?
- How long will it be kept?
- How can access be revoked, or deletion requested where that right applies?
Data minimization limits unnecessary exposure. It also makes the record easier to read: the professional gets to the information that answers the question at hand more quickly.
Understand the limits of automated summaries
A summary can pick out dates, group documents together and produce an overview. It can also miss a nuance, misread a file or wrongly connect two events. You must therefore be able to trace every piece of information back to its source.
A good interface shows what comes from an original document, what was entered by the user and what was generated automatically. It allows corrections and flags uncertainty.
Medical document
Produced or validated by a professional. Keep the author, date, facility and document type.
Wearable data
How useful it is depends on the monitoring goal and on how reliable the measurement is.
Personal note
Valuable, but must be kept distinct from a document produced or validated by a professional.
Automated summary
Can miss a nuance or misread a file: you must be able to trace it back to the source.
With MyTwin for patients, reports, lab results, imaging and letters are brought together in one place, then presented in a structured, chronological and readable way, with more accessible reading levels. It helps you keep track of your care and prepare your questions before an appointment, while medical interpretation remains with the professional who follows you. Kevin’s story — he sometimes waited two months for someone to explain his medical reports — shows why this matters.
A six-step method
- List the portals, paper files and devices where your documents are kept.
- Retrieve the priority documents first rather than importing every archive straight away.
- Standardize file names with a date, a specialty and a document type.
- Tell sources apart: medical document, wearable data, personal note or automated summary.
- Prepare a short overview for your next appointment: treatments, recent events and questions.
- Regularly review the access you have granted and remove duplicates without deleting useful originals.
The European Health Data Space regulation, which entered into force in March 2025, aims to make it easier to access and exchange health data across the European Union. It will be implemented gradually: not every announced capability will be available everywhere straight away.
Frequently asked questions
No. Several records can coexist. The professional or facility keeps the information produced during care under the applicable rules. The space used by the patient makes access and sharing easier, but does not remove those responsibilities.
Rewording can help you prepare questions, but it must not be used to reach a diagnosis, assess an emergency or change a treatment. Ask the professional who knows your situation to explain the clinical significance of the document.
Not necessarily. It depends on the monitoring goal, how reliable the measurement is and whether a professional can use it. Continuous collection without a protocol can produce more noise than useful information.
Turn on device lock, updates, controlled backups and, where possible, encryption. Avoid messaging apps or shared spaces that are not designed for health data.
Sources
- Assurance Maladie (French national health insurance), accessed September 16, 2026, “Mon espace santé”.
- CNIL, accessed September 16, 2026, “L’espace numérique de santé (ENS ou Mon espace santé) et le dossier médical partagé (DMP) : questions-réponses”.
- CNIL, accessed September 16, 2026, “Qu’est-ce qu’une donnée de santé ?”.
- Légifrance, version in force accessed September 16, 2026, French Public Health Code, article L1111-7.
- European Commission, accessed September 16, 2026, “European Health Data Space Regulation”.
This article is provided for information purposes only. It does not replace advice, diagnosis or treatment from a healthcare professional.
